TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PENYIDIK KEPOLISIAN TERHADAP BARANG BUKTI YANG KURANG LENGKAP

Ni Made Trisna Dewi

Sari


Examination of cases before the trial, as well as in the preliminary examination, there are many problems related to evidence. Although evidence has an important role in a criminal case, it is not that the presence of evidence is absolutely necessary in a criminal case. Where the judge in making a decision does not always rely on evidence because it only happens case by case, or it can be said that not all cases can be resolved just because of the evidence. The formulation of the problem raised in this study is what is the legal basis for the police against incomplete evidence and what is the legal responsibility of the police for incomplete evidence. This type of research is empirical legal research. This research uses an approach that examines the prevailing laws and regulations, legal theory, and can be in the form of scholars' opinions related to problems in this scientific paper, namely the legal responsibility of the police for incomplete evidence. The conclusion of this research is that the legal basis of the police for incomplete evidence is Article 110 paragraph (2) and (3) and Article 138 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code where the Public Prosecutor returns the case file to the investigator to complete the case file concerned. In returning the case file, the Public Prosecutor is also required to provide instructions regarding the incompleteness of the case file, both regarding the completeness of the case file clearly and clearly so that it can be understood by the Investigator.

Keywords: Responsibility, police, incomplete evidence


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


AAbdulkadir Muhammad. (2006). Etika Profesi Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Andi Hamzah. (2009). Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Djoko Prakoso. (2012). Penyidik. Penuntut Umum. Hakim. dalam Proses Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Koesparmono Irsan. (2007). Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Lilik Mulyadi. (2012). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana Umum dan Khusus Dalam Teori dan Praktik. Bandung: PT Alumni.

M. Fauzy RA. (2019). “Tanggungjawab Penyidik Dalam Mengamankan Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Daerah Riau”. Journal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau Volume VI Edisi 2.

Momo Kelana. (2012). Hukum Kepolisian. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Ratna Nurul Afiah. (2011). Barang Bukti Dalam Proses Pidana. Jakarta: sinar Grafika.

Roscoe Pound. (2009). Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Bhratara.

Siswanto Sunarto. (2004). Penegakan Hukum Psikotropika Dalam Kajian Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudarsono. (2007). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Tim Redaksi Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (2012). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25078/vd.v16i1.1431

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


width="135" width="135"    

View My Stats