UPAYA PEMANGGILAN PAKSA OLEH BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) TERHADAP PELAKU USAHA YANG TIDAK HADIR DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN

Rai Mantili

Sari


One of the authorities of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) is to receive both written and unwritten complaints from consumers regarding the occurrence of violations of consumer protection. Article 52 Sub-Article g of the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK) au- thorizes BPSK to summon business actors who allegedly violate consumer protection. However, in practice in the field, BPSK is not authorized to force involuntary calling of business actors so that many business actors refuse to be present at consumer dispute resolution in BPSK. This research is Normative and Analytical Descriptive Research. In this case, it is a Nor- mative Legal Research in the form of research to find the Law of Concreto, the research to find the law for a case in concreto is an attempt to find out whether the appropriate law to apply in cocreto in order to solve a particular case and see the rule of law is found . This research will illustrate various legal issues and other symptoms related to cases concerning consumer protec- tion and BPSK Implementation of consumer protection law enforcement in practice is not yet fully fea- sible. It can be seen apart from awareness of the ability and independence of consumers to protect themselves against the rights and kewajibanya, also can be seen from law enforcement officers who have not performed optimally. efforts that can be made by BPSK after forced calling of business actors who refuse to attend the consumer dispute resolution can make a verdict verdict if the business actor is not present 3 times on the summons of the session by BPSK as stipulated in Article 52 UUPK and Kemendag. 35/2001.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Ahmadi Miru, Prinsip-Prinsip Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen di Indonesia, Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 2000

A.Z Nasution, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Suatu Pengantar, Daya Widya, Jakarta, 1999.

C.S.T. Kansil, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Penerbit Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 1989.

Lili Rasjidi dan Ira Rasjidi, Dasar – Dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2001. Man S

Sastrawidjaja, Asuransi Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Usaha Dalam Hubungan Dengan UU No.8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Mimbar Hukum Majalah Fakultas Hukum UGM.

Munir Fuady, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2005.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, Konsep Konsep Hukum Dalam Pembangunan, Penerbit Alumni, Bandung, 2002.

Nahattands V Lamboek, Product Liability Dalam Rangka Perlindungan Konsumen”, Lokakarya Rancangan UUPK, Kerjasama Lembaga Penelitian UI dengan Departemen Perindustrian dan Perdagangan tanggal 16 Oktober 1996, Jakarta.

Retnowulan Sutantio dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 1993

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1988

Shidarta, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, PT Gramedia Widiasarna Indonesia, Jakarta, 2004.

Sri redjeki Hartono, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Di Indonesia (Tinjauan Makro),Mimbar Hukum Majalah Fakultas Hukum UGM, No. 39/X/2001

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Penerbit Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1998

Peraturan Perundang-undangan Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata atau Herzeine Inlandsch Reglement (HIR)

Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI No. 01 Tahun 2006 Tentang Tata Cara Pengajuan Keberatan Terhadap Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen.

Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Republik IndonesiaNomor 350/Mpp/Kep/12/2001 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Wewenang Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen


Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.