Peranan Painting Bali sebagai Cendramata Khas Bali

I Gusti Ketut Indra Pranata Darma

Sari


There are a lot of factors that make a product can be categorized as a souvenir typical of a region. Among them is having the distinctiveness of a place or unique, can be carried by hand,  relative price, has a value of reminiscence, is able to be awarded and have the memory of events from somewhere. Typical regional products Gianyar one of them is Painting fabrice. This study aims to determine whether painting fabrics fulfills the criteria for a souvenir and development efforts. The study was conducted using qualitative method by conducting depth interviews with informants. Informants are looking for is a trader and craftsmen painting fabric, and buyers who frequently use the product painting fabrics. Based on research data obtained, painting fabrics can be called as souvenirs of the Bali because it has a strong characteristic 5 of the 6 available. For development efforts that have been made for this, among others, by utilizing technology to introduce the product, participated in the exhibition to get a new variation of the motif.

Keywords :Souvenirs, painting fabrics, and Performance Criteria


Kata Kunci


Souvenirs, painting fabrics, and Performance Criteria

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Budiono, B., dan Vincent, A. 2011. “Batik Industry of Indonesia: The Rise, Fall and Prospects”. University of Pancasila.

Collins-Kreiner, N., dan Zins, Y. 2010. “Tourists and Souvenirs: change through time, space and meaning”. University of Haifa. Daniati dan Achir. 2015. “Penerapan Teknik Hand Painting dengan menggunakan Cat Poster terhadap Kulit telur pada Hasil Jadi Wall Hanging”. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Darnawi. 2011. “Pengaruh Konsep Bauran Pemasaran terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen dan Keputusan Membeli Produk Batik di Malioboro”. Tesis: Program Pasca Sarjana, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata Indonesia.

Gede Nangga, Sila, dan Eka. 2018. “Kerajinan Tenun Endek Lukis di Desa Sulang, Kecamatan Kabupaten Klungkung”.

Undiksha. Hamzuri. 1989. Batik Klasik (Classical Batik). Jakarta: Djambatan.

Hoven, E.v.d., dan Eggen, B. 2005. “Personal souvenirs as Ambient Intelligent Objects”. Eindhoven University of Technology.

Indonesian Batik: A Cultural Beauty. 2008. Departemen Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Balitbangdag.

Kusumaningtyas, R.F. 2009. “Perlindungan Hak Cipta atas Motif Batik Sebagai Warisan Budaya Bangsa (Studi Terhadap Karya Seni Tradisional Kraton Surakarta”. Tesis. Semarang: Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Diponegoro.

Mijoc, J., Hornis, M., Tomasevic. N., dan Horvat, J. 2011.”Book As A Souvenir: Partnership Between Tourism Potentials, Cultural Identity Promotion and Publisher’s Profits”. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Croatia.

Murtadlo, A. 2013. “Upaya Pengembangan Usaha Pengrajin Batik Malangan (Studi Kasus di Desa Druju Kecamatan Sumbermanjing Wetan Kabupaten Malang)”. Universitas Brawijaya.

Nomura, M. 2002. “Souvenir Purchase Patterns of Domestic Tourists”. University of Winconsin-Stout.

Oparinde, S.S. 2012. “Batik As A Cultural Identity Of The Yoruba:Hand Colouring Techniques And Applications, Possibility Of Adaptations”. International Refereed Research Journal.

Purwaningtyas,N.E., Widiarto,T.,dan Purwiyastuti,W. 2014. “Potensi Kain painting Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata di Kabupaten Pati”. Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga.

Rahayu, K. 2008. “Upaya Perlindungan Batik Lasem Oleh Pemerintah Kabupaten Rembang”. Tesis. Semarang: Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Diponegoro.

Sarwosri, A. J., 2010. “Upaya Pemberdayaan Perempuan dalam Pengembangan Wisata Budaya Batik (Study Kasus Kampoeng Batik Laweyan Surakarta)”. Tesis: Program Pascasarjana, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata Indonesia.

Wilkins., H. 2009. “Souvenis: What and why we buy”. Griffith University.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25078/pba.v4i2.1121

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


 

 

 

View My Stats