Kebijakan Editorial

Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup

Jurnal Pariwisata Budaya yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Dharma Duta, Institut Hindu Dharma Negeri Denpasar ini didedikasikan sebagai penyebaran ide, gagasan, maupun masukan yang positif terkait perencanaan, pengembangan dan evaluasi pariwisata agama dan budaya, sebab objek materi pariwisata dalam agama dan budaya sudah menjadi sangat real dalam perkembangan pariwisata belakangan ini.

Pariwisata belakangan tidak hanya melihat agama dan budaya, tetapi juga telah ingin merasakan atau menikmati agama dan budaya yang disebut dengan ingin mendapatkan pengalaman. Hal-hal ini yang menjadi bahasan dalam artikel-artikel pada jurnal ini, yang berhubungan dengan objek-objek materi pariwisata dalam ranah agama dan budaya.

Objek-objek materi ini menggunakan situs-situs alam, budaya dan buatan manusia. Karena itu, fokus jurnal ini adalah pengelolaan situs, promosi dan pemasaran menjadi pokok-pokok bahasan dalam artikel-artikel yang akan dimuat. Aspek-aspek bahasan dalam jurnal ini adalah pariwisata lingkungan, pariwisata budaya, heritage tourism, charity tourism, pilgrimage, secular pilgrimage, dampak pariwisata terhadap situs-situs keagamaan pada alam, budaya dan buatan manusia, perencanaan pariwisata agama dan budaya, pengelolaan pariwisata agama dan budaya, serta pengaruh-pengaruh pariwisata terhadap berbagai aspek kehidupan agama dan budaya.

 

 

Kebijakan Bagian

Artikel

Centang Naskah Terbuka Centang Diindeks Centang Telah di-Peer review

Artikel

Tidak Dicentang Naskah Terbuka Centang Diindeks Tidak Dicentang Telah di-Peer review
 

Proses Peer Review

Kebijakan Review :

1. Reviewer menerima naskah double blind review dari editor bagian atau
sekretariat redaksi. Apabila tidak sesuai kompetensinya, reviewer berhak
menolak naskah dan merekomendasikannya ke reviewer lain yangl ebih
kompeten.
 
2. Satu orang reviewer minimal mereview satu artikel dan satu artikel minimal
direview oleh satu reviewer.
 
3. Reviewer menelaah naskah dari aspek kualitas dan substansi penulisan (bukan tata bahasa naskah), yang mencakup keterbaruan,keaslian,kemanfaatan,serta
kevalidan kutipan dan daftar pustaka.

 

Frekuensi Penerbitan

Jurnal Pariwisata Budaya akan terbit dua kali setahun yakni bulan Maret dan Oktober

 

Kebijakan Akses Terbuka

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka yang pada prinsipnya membuat riset tersedia secara gratis untuk publik dan akan mensupport pertukaran pengetahuan global terbesar.

 

Pengarsipan

OJS sistem LOCKSS berfungsi sebagai sistem pengarsipan terdistribusi antar-perpustakaan yang menggunakan sistem ini dengan tujuan membuat arsip permanen (untuk preservasi dan restorasi). Lanjut...

 

Review Process of Manuscript: Initial Review

Read the abstract to be sure that you have the expertise to review the article. Don’t be afraid to say no to reviewing an article if there is the good reason.
Read information provided by the journal for reviewers so you will know: a) The type of manuscript (e.g., a review article, technical note, original research) and the journal’s expectations/parameters for that type of manuscript.; b) Other journal requirements that the manuscript must meet (e.g., length, citation style).
Know the journal’s scope and mission to make sure that the topic of the paper fits in the scope.
Ready? Read through entire manuscript initially to see if the paper is worth publishing- only make a few notes about major problems if such exist: a) Is the question of interest sound and significant?; b) Was the design and/or method used adequately or fatally flawed? (for original research papers); c) Were the results substantial enough to consider publishable (or were only two or so variables presented or resulted so flawed as to render the paper unpublishable)?
What is your initial impression? If the paper is: a) Acceptable with only minor comments/questions: solid, interesting, and new; sound methodology used; results were well presented; discussion well formulated with Interpretations based on sound science reasoning, etc., with only minor comments/questions, move directly to writing up review; b) Fatally flawed so you will have to reject it: move directly to writing up review; c) A mixture somewhere in the range of “revise and resubmit” to “accepted with major changes” or you’re unsure if it should be rejected yet or not: It may be a worthy paper, but there are major concerns that would need to be addressed.

 

Full Review Process of Manuscript

Writing: Is the manuscript easy to follow, that is, has a logical progression and evident organisation?
Is the manuscript concise and understandable? Any parts that should be reduced,
Eliminated/expanded/added?
Note if there are major problems with mechanics: grammar, punctuation, spelling. (If there are just a few places that aren’t worded well or correctly, make a note to tell the author the specific places. If there are consistent problems throughout, only select an example or two if need be- don’t try and edit the whole thing).
Abbreviations: Used judiciously and are composed such that reader won’t have trouble remembering what an abbreviation represents.
Follows style, format and other rules of the journal.
Citations are provided when providing evidence-based information from outside sources.

 

Duties of Authors


Fair Play:
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality:
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Publication Decisions:
The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Review of Manuscripts:
The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organise and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions:
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness:
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process
Standards of Objectivity:
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Confidentiality:
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Acknowledgement of Sources:
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge

 

Plagiarism Screening

Before going to review process, all manuscripts will be checked that they are free from plagiarism practice using "Turnitin" software. If there an indication of plagiarism, the manuscript will instantly be rejected.

 

Copyright Transfer Agreement

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Lisensi a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors should sign copyright transfer agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu prior the publication