Dharmasasananing Pandita In Hindu Diversity System In Bali

I Ketut Sudarsana

Abstract


Hindus feel disappointed and disgraced if one of their figures who should be a leader and purified does a disgraceful deed such as having an illegal wife, working as a middleman, slandering and so forth. In short, Hindus feel disappointed and disgraced if one of their figures who should be a leader and purified “deviates” from the ethical code of priesthood (dharmasasaning pandita). Just to remind again that when someone starts his priesthood, the ethical cod of priesthood (dharmasasananing pandita) should be used as the parameter of his identity as a holy person. In many Hindu literary works, the dharmasasananing pandita has been included. The reasons why a priest often ‘deviates’ from the ethical code of priesthood are as follows. From the internal dimension, the senior priest (nabe) is often used as a symbol, the impact of the symbolic capital “power” and the impact of uncontrollable sexual libido. The external dimension includes: the impact of external ‘education’, the impact of genealogical caste, and impact of the market ideology. The implications on a priest are as follows: he will become a what is called patita, he will die young, he will go to hell, and it is believed that, when he is reincarnated, he will not become a human being any longer. The implications on society are as follows: conflicts cannot be avoided, more and more people are getting poor, religious conversion cannot be avoided, and society will become psychologically depressed.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Irwan dkk. 2008. Dialektika Teks Suci Agama, Strukturasi Makna Agama dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Gajah Mada dan Pustaka Pelajar.

Ahmadi, Abu. 2009. Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Amirin, Tatang M. 2003. Pokok-Pokok Teori Sistem. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Anandamurti, Shrii Shrii. 2008. Pegetahuan Spritual dalam Kitab Veda. Jakarta: Ananda Marga Indonesia.

Astra, I Gede Semadi dkk. 2001. Kamus Sanskerta Indonesia. Denpasar: Proyek Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Pemerintah Daerah Tingkat I Bali.

Atmadja, Nengah Bawa. 2010. Komodifikasi Tubuh Perempuan, Joged “Ngebor Bali”. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan.

Ali, Sayuti. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Agama Pendekatan Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Bagus, Lorens. 2005. Kamus Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Bertens, K. 2002. Etika. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Bungin, Burhan (ed.). 2003. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Daksa, Acharya Paramananda Muni. 2009. Siddhashram Ratu Bagus, dari Informasi Menuju Transformasi. Denpasar: Gue Deliquantum Volor Alisis Acil U dan Udayana Universitas Press.

Endraswara, Suwardi. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada Universitas Press.

Gunadha, Ida Bagus, 2008. “Identitas Manusia Bali: Perspektif Adat, Agama, dan Budaya”. dalam Makalah Kongres Kebudayaan Bali 14-16 Juni 2008 di Denpasar.

Hardiman, F. Budi. 1993. Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif. Ilmu, Masayarakat, Politik, dan Posmodernisme Menurut Jurgen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Howard, Roy J. 2000. Three Faces Of Hermeneutics: An Introduction to Current Theories of Understanding. Pengantar Atas Teori-Teori Pemahaman Kontemporer: Hermeneutik; Wacana Analitik, Psikososial dan Ontologis. (Terj. Kusmana dan M.S. Nasrullah). Bandung: Nuansa.

Hooykaas. C. 1971. Stuti and Stava (Bauddha, Saiva and Vaisnava Of Balinese Priest). Amsterdam: Nort Holland Publising Company.

Jalaludiin. 2010. Psikologi Agama. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Leatherman, Janie dkk., 2004. Memutuskan Siklus Kekerasan Pencegahan Konflik dalam Krisis Intranegara. (Terj. Muba Simanihuruk dan Subhilhar. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada Universitas Press.

Kadjeng, I Nyoman, dkk.1997. Sarasamuccaya. Surabaya: Paramita.

Kaelan. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Bidang Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.

Maryaeni. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kebudayaan. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.

Maswinara, I Wayan (Penerjemah). 2000. Bhagavad Gita. Surabaya: Paramita.

Moeleong, Lexy J, 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rodaskarya.

Mufid, Muhamad. 2009. Etika dan Filsafat Komunikasi. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Muzir, Inyiak Ridwan. 2008. Hermeneutik Filosofis Hans-Georg Gadamer.

Novia, Windy. T.t. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Surabaya: Kashiko.

Pals, Daniel. 2001. Seven Theoris Of Religion. (Terj. Ali Noer Zaman).Yogyakarta: Qalam.

Pandit, Bansi. 2001. The Hindu Mind. New Delhi: New Age Books.

.Pandit, Bansi. 2005. The Hindu Mind. Pemikiran Hindu (Terj. IGA Dewi Paramitha). Surabaya: Paramita.

Poerwadarminta, W.J.S. 1976. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Pendit, I Nyoman S. 1986. Bhagavadgita. Jakarta: Dharma Nusantara.

Pigeaud,Theodore G. TH. 1980. Literatur of Java Volume IV Supplement. Leiden Universitas Press.

Priyatna, Haris. 2013. Kamus Sosiologi, Deskriptif dan Mudah Dipahami. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.

Pudja, I Gde dan Tjok Rai Sudharta. 2002. Manawa Dharmasastra. Wedasmrti Compedium Hukum Hindu. Jakarta: Nursatama Lestari.

Polomo, Margareth Mead. 2000. Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Priyono, B. Herry. 2002. Anthony Giddens Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia (KPG).

Radhakrishnan, S. 2003. Religion And Society. (Terj. Tim Penerjemahan Program Magister Ilmu Agama dan Kebudayaan Universitas Hindu Indonesia: Indiani dan Inten Mayuni). Denpasar: Widya Dharma.

Ritzer, George dan Douglas J. Goodman. 2005. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Saebani, Beni Ahmad. 2007. Sosiologi Agama. Bandung: Refika Aditama

Sarma, PT. Kisanlal, 2007. Mengapa? Tradisi dan Upacara Agama. Surabaya: Paramita.

Subandi, 2014. Ekonomi Pembangunan. Bandung: Alpabeta.

Spradley. James P. 1997. The Etnografic Interviu. Metode Etnografi. (Terj. Misbah Zulfa Elisabeth). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Singarimbun, Masri dan Sofian Effendi (ed.). 1987. Metodologi Penelitian Survai. Jakarta: LP3S.

Soetriono dan SRDm Rita Hanafie. 2007. Filsafat Ilmu dan Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: andi.

Sudharta, Tjok. 2003. Slokantara, Untaian Ajaran Etika, Teks, Terjemahan, dan Ulasan. Surabaya: Paramita

Sukarsa, Made. 2009. Biasa Upacara Manusia Bali. Denpasar: Arti Foundantion.

Supriyadi, Gering. 2000. Etika Birokrasi. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia (LAN-RI).

Syani, Abdul. 2007. Sosiologi, Skematika, Teori dan Terapan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Tim Penyusun. 1991. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Wiana, I Ketut. 2002. Veda Vakya Tuntunan Praktis Memahami Veda, Jilid Pertama. Denpasar: Pustaka Bali Post.

Wilkes, Chris, Richar Harker dan Cheelen Mahar (ed.). T.t. (Habitus x Modal) + Ranah = Praktik, Pengantar Paling Konprehensif kepada Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Jala Sutra.

Wirawan. 2013. Kepemimpin, Teori, Psikologi, Prilaku Organisasi, Aplikasi dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Zoetmulder, P.J. dan Robson. 1977. Kamus Jawa-Kuno-Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25078/ijhsrs.v2i2.625

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Vidyottama Sanatana: International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies Indexed By :

 

 

Vidyottama Sanatana: International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-SA

 

web
analytics View My Stats